whitepaper
  • 1. Introduction
    • 1.1 AI Agents in Web3
    • 1.2 Introduction to DeAgentAI and our mission
  • 2 System Architecture and Workflow
  • 3. Technical Architecture of DeAgentAI’s Multi-Agent Index Network
    • 3.1 Neural Network Infrastructure
    • 3.2 LLM Model Integration
    • 3.3 Copilot3: A Tool LLM Designed for Web3 Scenarios
    • 3.4 InterConnect Rollup: Key for Management and Supervision
    • 3.5 Agent AKKA: Real-time Communication and Weak Consensus in the MAIN System
    • 3.6 QKV Index Network: Core of Intelligent Tool Management
    • 3.7 Agent Registration and Operation: Ensuring Trustworthy Execution Results
    • 3.8 Agent Coordination: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
    • 3.9 Multi-Agent Collaboration in Web3
    • 3.10 User Intention Recognition
    • 3.11 Intent Modeling Techniques
    • 3.12 Advanced Intelligence in Meeting User Needs
  • 4. Applications
  • 5 Security and Privacy Protection
    • 5.1 User Privacy Protection
    • 5.2 Distributed Execution Security
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. 3. Technical Architecture of DeAgentAI’s Multi-Agent Index Network

3.12 Advanced Intelligence in Meeting User Needs

Previous3.11 Intent Modeling TechniquesNext4. Applications

Last updated 8 months ago

The MAIN system's ability to continuously learn and adapt is a cornerstone of its advanced intelligence, enabling it to refine its understanding of user needs and improve its response capabilities over time. This adaptive learning process is underpinned by several key theoretical and technical frameworks.

Reinforcement Learning (RL)

At the heart of the system's adaptive learning is Reinforcement Learning (RL), a machine learning paradigm where the system learns by interacting with its environment, receiving feedback in the form of rewards or penalties. The MAIN system employs RL algorithms such as Deep Q-Networks (DQN) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) to optimize its decision-making processes. By analyzing the outcomes of previous interactions, the system can adjust its strategies to maximize long-term user satisfaction. The RL framework allows the MAIN system to not only respond to immediate feedback but also anticipate future user needs by developing policies that generalize well across different scenarios.

In the RL framework, the system’s environment is modeled as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) defined by the tuple (S,A,P,R,γ) (\mathcal{S}, \mathcal{A}, \mathcal{P}, \mathcal{R}, \gamma) (S,A,P,R,γ), where:

- S \mathcal{S} S represents the state space,

- A \mathcal{A} A represents the action space,

- P(s′∣s,a) \mathcal{P}(s' \mid s, a) P(s′∣s,a) is the state transition probability,

- R(s,a) \mathcal{R}(s, a) R(s,a) is the reward function, and

- γ \gamma γ is the discount factor, which balances immediate and future rewards.

The goal is to find a policy π(a∣s) \pi(a \mid s) π(a∣s) that maximizes the expected cumulative reward, also known as the return:

Gt=∑k=0∞γkrt+k+1.G_t = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \gamma^k r_{t+k+1}.Gt​=k=0∑∞​γkrt+k+1​.

For a Deep Q-Network (DQN), the Q-value Q(s,a;θ) Q(s, a; \theta) Q(s,a;θ) is approximated using a neural network with parameters θ \theta θ. The Q-learning update rule is:

θt+1=θt+α[rt+γmax⁡a′Q(s′,a′;θt)−Q(s,a;θt)]∇θQ(s,a;θt),\theta_{t+1} = \theta_t + \alpha \left[ r_t + \gamma \max_{a'} Q(s', a'; \theta_t) - Q(s, a; \theta_t) \right] \nabla_{\theta} Q(s, a; \theta_t),θt+1​=θt​+α[rt​+γa′max​Q(s′,a′;θt​)−Q(s,a;θt​)]∇θ​Q(s,a;θt​),

Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) involves optimizing the policy by maximizing a clipped surrogate objective:

Continuous Data Integration

To maintain a high level of responsiveness and relevance, the MAIN system engages in continuous data integration. This process involves the real-time ingestion and analysis of diverse data streams, including user interactions, environmental changes, and broader market trends. The system leverages data fusion techniques and real-time analytics platforms to integrate and process data from multiple sources simultaneously.

By continuously integrating data and updating its models, the MAIN system ensures that it remains adaptive and capable of delivering highly personalized and contextually appropriate responses, aligned with the latest user preferences and behaviors.

Algorithmic Refinement

Algorithmic refinement is a critical component of the MAIN system's adaptive learning capability. The system continuously evaluates the performance of its underlying algorithms, using techniques such as Hyperparameter Optimization and Meta-Learning to enhance their accuracy and efficiency. The MAIN system employs Bayesian Optimization and Genetic Algorithms to search for optimal configurations of its models, ensuring that they are fine-tuned to the specific characteristics of the user population it serves. Additionally, the system integrates feedback loops that allow for the automatic adjustment of model parameters based on real-time performance metrics, ensuring sustained improvement in response quality over time.

The surrogate model is typically modeled using Gaussian Processes (GP), and acquisition functions such as Expected Improvement (EI) or Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) are used to select the next evaluation point.

Intelligent Response Systems

The MAIN system's intelligent response systems are designed to provide not just answers but insightful, context-aware, and personalized interactions that align closely with user needs. These systems are built on advanced neural network architectures and leverage the full capabilities of the LLM model.

Context-Aware Responses

Context-awareness is achieved through the use of attention mechanisms and context embedding techniques. The MAIN system employs models like Transformer-based architectures that are capable of processing and retaining long-term dependencies across the input sequence. This allows the system to consider the full context of the user’s query, including previous interactions, environmental variables, and the specific circumstances surrounding the query. By leveraging hierarchical attention networks and contextual word embeddings, the system can tailor its responses to be highly relevant and precise, addressing the user's needs in a manner that reflects a deep understanding of their unique situation.

Proactive assistance is facilitated through predictive modeling and anticipatory algorithms. The MAIN system uses models such as Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) and Sequence-to-Sequence (Seq2Seq) frameworks to predict future user needs based on historical data and current interaction patterns. By integrating predictive analytics with real-time user data, the system can offer assistance before the user explicitly requests it, enhancing the overall user experience. Techniques such as Anomaly Detection and Time Series Forecasting are employed to identify potential issues or opportunities for intervention, allowing the system to proactively guide users towards their goals.

Personalized Interactions

Personalization is achieved through the use of user modeling and collaborative filtering techniques. The MAIN system maintains detailed profiles for each user, built from a combination of explicit user inputs and implicit behavioral data. These profiles are continuously updated using techniques like Matrix Factorization and Deep Learning-based recommendation systems, which allow the system to predict and align with the user's preferences, habits, and historical interactions. By employing multi-modal user profiles that incorporate data from text, voice, and behavioral signals, the system is able to deliver responses that are not only accurate but also resonate with the individual user on a personal level.

where α \alpha α is the learning rate, and ∇θQ \nabla_{\theta} Q ∇θ​Q is the gradient with respect to the network parameters.

LPPO(θ)=Et[min⁡(rt(θ)A^t,clip(rt(θ),1−ϵ,1+ϵ)A^t)],\mathcal{L}^{\text{PPO}}(\theta) = \mathbb{E}_t \left[ \min \left( r_t(\theta) \hat{A}_t, \text{clip}(r_t(\theta), 1 - \epsilon, 1 + \epsilon) \hat{A}_t \right) \right],LPPO(θ)=Et​[min(rt​(θ)A^t​,clip(rt​(θ),1−ϵ,1+ϵ)A^t​)],

where rt(θ) r_t(\theta) rt​(θ) is the probability ratio between the new and old policies, A^t \hat{A}_t A^t​ is the advantage estimate, and ϵ \epsilon ϵ is a hyperparameter that controls the clip range.

Let Dt={dt,1,dt,2,…,dt,n} D_t = \{d_{t,1}, d_{t,2}, \dots, d_{t,n}\} Dt​={dt,1​,dt,2​,…,dt,n​} represent the set of data streams at time t t t. The integrated data It I_t It​ can be modeled as:

It=Fusion(Dt),I_t = \text{Fusion}(D_t),It​=Fusion(Dt​),

where Fusion(⋅) \text{Fusion}(\cdot) Fusion(⋅) is the data fusion function that combines information from multiple sources.

The system employs Online Learning to update its models incrementally as new data arrives. Given the model parameters θt \theta_t θt​ at time t t t, the updated parameters θt+1 \theta_{t+1} θt+1​ are obtained as:

θt+1=θt−η∇θL(It,θt),\theta_{t+1} = \theta_t - \eta \nabla_{\theta} \mathcal{L}(I_t, \theta_t),θt+1​=θt​−η∇θ​L(It​,θt​),

where η \eta η is the learning rate, and L \mathcal{L} L is the loss function that measures the discrepancy between the model's predictions and the actual outcomes.

Bayesian Optimization involves constructing a surrogate model g(θ) g(\theta) g(θ) to approximate the objective function f(θ) f(\theta) f(θ), where θ \theta θ represents the hyperparameters. The optimization process can be expressed as:

θ∗=arg⁡max⁡θg(θ).\theta^* = \arg \max_{\theta} g(\theta).θ∗=argθmax​g(θ).
αi=exp⁡(ei)∑j=1nexp⁡(ej),ei=score(ht,si),\alpha_i = \frac{\exp(e_i)}{\sum_{j=1}^{n} \exp(e_j)}, \quad e_i = \text{score}(h_t, s_i),αi​=∑j=1n​exp(ej​)exp(ei​)​,ei​=score(ht​,si​),

where ht h_t ht​ is the current state, si s_i si​ is the historical information, and score(ht,si) \text{score}(h_t, s_i) score(ht​,si​) measures the relevance between the current state and the historical information.